The OK Computer/In Rainbows conspiracy

Wow, slow news day? That’s pathetic…

*yawn*

lol. i think someone is looking futher into things than necessary. or maybe not. who knows.

Actually, the real conspiracy is that the real OK Computer was never released. In Rainbows is the real Ok Computer. They weren’t ready to release it 10 years ago. It was going to be called In Computer.

Yeah, and Thom Yorke never actually recovered from his depression. The real Thom Yorke committed suicide years ago, the Thom Yorke you see now is actually an intricate illusion created by a malignant supercomputer that hijacked our brains and make us believe the greatest band on the planet is still playing, so that we won’t notice that we have actually been turned into human batteries.

and did you guys know that only when
music is burned onto a CD (and the CD
has those 1’s and 0’s) does that CD
get those rainbow colours when you
aim it toward the light….fact!
‘In rainbows’ could actually mean
‘in music’….

the true conspiracy is that ok computer and kid a had sex with eachother and 10 years later pops out in/rainbows. its their love child and its one fantastic album.

HOLY THEORIES

If I were a chromosome X would indicate my sex – if I were a voter X would express my preference – If I were a lover X would send you a kiss – If I were an alphabet X would be my 24th letter – If I studied Geometry X would be the first coordinate – If I were a treasure hunter or a detective in a crime scene X would mark the spot – If I were a film censor I’d give your dirty, violent movie an X Rating – If I were an assassin X would have you in my sites – If I were a radiographer, I’d see right through you with me X-Rays – If I were a mathematician X would be the first unknown quantity – If I were illiterate X would mark my signature – If I were a teacher X would be the mark I’d give you for being wrong…..

This kind of limited thinking is so typical of earthling conspiracy theorists, in that the majority of their theories can be blown apart by simply applying some common sense to their outlandish claims, which have usually arisen from their exceedingly narrow, oft ill informed person centered view of the world. And whilst you are all caught up in the likes of this and are too busy to take a ‘real’ look around, you all completely fail to see the momentous conspiracy going on all the time, right under your noses…..

Take the ridiculous amount of store that was set in the ‘spooky’ way that all of the remaining metal girders from the fallen Twin Towers, were of the same length, pointing towards ‘explosions’ on each floor. These idiots have clearly never been on a building site in their lives – did they think that girders were hundreds of feet long, or notwithstanding that, surely they would realise that when any kind of structure comes under pressure, it’s most likely to break at the joints….. Anyway, I’m sure you catch my drift, and concede that your binary ‘theory’ is full of 0000000 wholes, and will now perhaps go and visit a lonely old person and make their day, instead of wasting anymore time on this matter – who knows what goes on inside the radioheads of popstars…..

JunoXL5 (ps – and just in case you were wondering, my name doesn’t mean juno65 or juno11 – the juno is after a Roland synthesiser, and the XL5 comes from the name of an American motor oil in the 1960’s, which was taken by filmmaker Gerry Anderson, and used in the title of his brilliant 60’s TV space puppet show, Fireball XL5 – there’s always at least 10 sides to every story)

1+1=10 ?????

OKC=LP3
IR=LP7

3+7=10!

and to the skeptics, CHILL THE FUCK OUT & LET US HAVE OUR FUN!

@imatumbler… Excellent! Awsome use of the numericals ;()-

When I get my Boxset i’m playing the whole album all the way through, the next album all the way through, the record till the very end… both of them… and then playing them backwards… I have a good feeling that there are secret songs all over the Boxset. Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There are 10 types of people in the world: Those that understand binary, and those that don’t.

whatever. i’m listening to all the 7 albums now with shuffle & 10-sec crossfade on. adding all the singles, eps, live versions, etc would be too much.

“In Rainbows” consists of 10 letters.

What does it all mean? On a scale of 1-10, the album is obvioulsy a 10.

I made a playlist based on that hypothetic theory of same chords… and I got this : http://puddlegum.net/radiohead-01-and-10/ comment 112.

everyone is now dumber.

i really dont understand the binary thing. 01 = 1
10= 2
one is complimentary to 2?

sounds like a load of bollocks to me

Related conspiracy discovered here.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2767051.ece

I am not saying Radiohead are involved, but who can say for sure that they are not?

i like to think about radiohead

If “7″ it’s a perfect number… so this is their LP7 I conclude that this record is perfect.

A pile of trivialities… LMAO!

“the true conspiracy is that ok computer and kid a had sex with eachother and 10 years later pops out in/rainbows. its their love child and its one fantastic album.”

Lawlz.

i don’t think we’ve gotten it yet, but i’m sure there’s something to it. thom mentioned ok computer a lot in interviews when they were making “in rainbows,” and releasing a 10 track album on 10/10 with 10 mysterious posts is a little much to ignore.

besides, what was the last album they recorded in an old mansion? yep.

I N R A I N B O W S has ten letters

I would like to add that the song “Nude” is directly coming from the recording period of OK Computer… and now it’s on In Rainbows.
Why Radiohead didn’t put this song on Kid A or Amnesiac or HTTT before ??

Скажите, а можно ли взять какие-нибудь статьи с вашего сайта? Со ссылкой на первоисточник конечно же.