Latest Radiohead News

Radiohead News posted by

Observer – Your Questions Answered

A couple of weeks ago we asked you to send your questions for Radiohead to Observer journalist Craig McLean. In this weekend’s Observer Music Monthly some of those questions have been answered.

However, we didn’t get a clear answer on the question how many ‘In Rainbows’ Discboxes were sold: Ed: ‘I think there’s about 80,000 discboxes.’ Jonny: ‘60,000.’ Ed: ‘It was 65,000 a week ago.’ Colin: ‘It’s 72,000.’

On Lily Allen’s recent blast towards Radiohead, saying the band are arrogant giving their music away, Thom reacted [clapping hands and emitting high-pitched laughter]: ‘Oh, I’m upset about that.’ So that’s no comment? Thom: ‘Well, that was my comment. It makes me laugh.’

Ed said the big change on ‘In Rainbows’ are Thom’s lyrics, not being scared to be personal: “I think it was really liberating for him to do [his solo album] The Eraser. His voice is really upfront. That’s the most noticeable thing. He’s not hiding. And after OK Computer he sort of withdrew a bit. I think it’s also being bold enough and brave enough to be personal. And you know what… there’s stuff to write about in your late thirties. You’ve lived. You’ve started families up.’Jonny: ‘You’re a different person.’

Ed: ‘Yeah, you’ve stopped dealing with, “Me, I’m the centre of everything.” Because you’ve got kids you can’t do that. So, it changes. It was like, “Wow, there’s a warmth to these songs, it’s very human.”‘

Thom: ‘Ed always banged on about how this record was very sensual. The mind boggles slightly, but I think there was a lot of that. It was as much about the way it flowed and whatever, not specific things. But it is kind of… it’s not supposed to be in any way cerebral.’

The band also responded on the impact of the release of ‘In Rainbows’.
Thom: ‘It was really fun. All this shit kicked off and we were all just sitting at home going [high- pitched], “What?”. It was brilliant. Hard hats on!’

Phil: ‘But also we felt quite detached from it… We’d be spotting the most bizarre place [in the media that the download ‘business’ idea] came up. One of the dads at school came up to me – he’s a car sales manager – and said, “You’re on the front page of Automotive Industry today!”‘

Thom Yorke revealed why he turned down Paul McCartney to do a duet: ‘Uhh, ’cause I can’t play piano. Not like that. I had to explain to him that, I listened to the tune – “Mr Bellamy” – and I really liked the song, but the piano playing involved two hands doing things separately. I don’t have that skill available. I said to him, “I strum piano, that’s it.”‘

And a webcast might be happening again soon. On the recent ‘Thumb’s Down’ webcast, when the band were playing live and DJ’ing,  Thom said: ‘We never play each other what we’re into normally. And the fact that people are watching is a bonus. But, also, it was a really nice thing to do because we set up this infrastructure and this way of thinking, and it’s a nice way to get into this idea of doing TV stuff.

‘Got to do it again in a couple of weeks,’ he sniffs. ‘But we have discovered a way where we can actually do it, not at the sort of bandwidth and quality that that one was, but we can do it off-the-cuff, stream it live from our studio whenever, which is fucking mental. It would be pretty lo-fi. So we might do a bit of that as well…’

Read the full interview at the Observer website.

Share Article:


  • that was a fun read 🙂

  • Wonderful interview. I can almost hear and see them all answering those questions.Phils english-teacher voice and Thoms headscratchings are so accurately described. Stan Laurel. HAHA! G.Hands will now appear surely in Phils nightmares as Mephistopheles.
    Well, it was great fun to read.

  • Reckoner as a “cock-rocking guitar stomp”? Surely that’s a typo, and they meant Bodysnatchers or Jigsaw pershaps?

  • I like how Thom says ‘Ed always banged on about how this record was very sensual’, Ed banging on as usual! You always get the idea that Ed’s the one that sets out to make sense of what Thom’s doing, whereas Thom doesn’t think about it too much. This is how a band works though. You’ve already got an audience to give you immediate feedback – the other band members.

  • i adore jonny!!!

    and thom, and all the band, they always have great interviews.

  • I really enjoy that the band plays live on their webcasts. Its beautiful to hear them play songs that turn them on or the ones that influence their hearts. Radiohead… play all the songs you’ve ever dreamed of playing… I’ll be listening and anticipating the live version. Even if I can’t get them, some of the Radiohead fan genuises will put them on YouTube for me to enjoy.

  • Sounds like they’re having so much fun with this.


  • It’s quite sad to read the comments for this post vs. those for the original post where Craig McLean asked for questions. I thought it was very nice of him to give fans that kind of access, and people on here had to be so rude about it. Seems the majority of Ateasers have taken to bashing Radiohead ever since Oct 10th, and it’s just getting lame. Thank god the only reason I come here anymore is to read adriaan’s news updates.

  • cool, thom wants to make movie


  • Lo-Fi. Yeah!

  • “Seems the majority of Ateasers have taken to bashing Radiohead ever since Oct 10th… ”


  • 🙂 that read great! x

  • What does he mean by Yorke’s “stubble”? The ever-present and rather gingery one…

  • [quote]What does he mean by Yorke’s “stubble”? The ever-present and rather gingery one…[/quote]
    Well, that’s another nice description of Thoms, quasi, beard.

  • so the song, on which Sir Paul wanted Thom to collaborate with him is Mr. Bellamy?! hahaha, well, that explains everything, doesn’t it?

  • very cool interview. my question wasn’t included but it pretty much got answered.

  • […] Yorke stated earlier that Lily Allen’s comments didn’t make much of an impression with the band. | | | […]

  • Хм… что-то у меня ссылка не открывается, которую указали. Это у всех так?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comments powered by Disqus