<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thom Yorke: &#8216;In Rainbows&#8217; is our classic album</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/</link>
	<description>You need to lighten up, you take things too SERIUSLEE</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hay guyz</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-18882</link>
		<dc:creator>hay guyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-18882</guid>
		<description>Radiohead's classic = Kid A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radiohead&#8217;s classic = Kid A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arie</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-18255</link>
		<dc:creator>Arie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-18255</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased to hear that Radiohead feel that way about In Rainbows. They should be proud of this amazing record they have made and enjoy their success to the fullest! They are comfortable enough to handle this now. Ten years ago they were not. 

Barrett: you think that In Rainbows won't be classic because they already had their classic album with OK Computer?! Au contraire! Revolver, for example, was a true classic. But so were Sgt Pepper, and Abbey Road, among others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased to hear that Radiohead feel that way about In Rainbows. They should be proud of this amazing record they have made and enjoy their success to the fullest! They are comfortable enough to handle this now. Ten years ago they were not. </p>
<p>Barrett: you think that In Rainbows won&#8217;t be classic because they already had their classic album with OK Computer?! Au contraire! Revolver, for example, was a true classic. But so were Sgt Pepper, and Abbey Road, among others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ep</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17946</link>
		<dc:creator>ep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17946</guid>
		<description>haha yeah i was gonna say what will said. i hope you were joking though. that's pretty much common knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha yeah i was gonna say what will said. i hope you were joking though. that&#8217;s pretty much common knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17941</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17941</guid>
		<description>99 pounds is not even close to 1000 bucks, its only $196 but it is very very generous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>99 pounds is not even close to 1000 bucks, its only $196 but it is very very generous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17937</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17937</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry, I LOVE Radiohead, but it's absolutely laughable that Radiohead will ever make an album as highly regarded as OK Computer ever again. OK Computer hit at the perfect time in society, just as computers and the internet really started to kick off in our homes, and it was scary, and frightening. That, and how absolutely amazing it was, is what made it classic. In Rainbows is a great album, but it will not be a classic album simply because they've already had their classic album, if that makes any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, I LOVE Radiohead, but it&#8217;s absolutely laughable that Radiohead will ever make an album as highly regarded as OK Computer ever again. OK Computer hit at the perfect time in society, just as computers and the internet really started to kick off in our homes, and it was scary, and frightening. That, and how absolutely amazing it was, is what made it classic. In Rainbows is a great album, but it will not be a classic album simply because they&#8217;ve already had their classic album, if that makes any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom Yorke: ‘In Rainbows’ is our classic album-Download Music</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17934</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Yorke: ‘In Rainbows’ is our classic album-Download Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17934</guid>
		<description>[...] joancarlson wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230; an interview with Thom Yorke today (January 3), earlier published in Der Spiegel, where he talks about new album ‘In Rainbows’ and the inevitable questions on Radiohead’s ‘pay-what-you-want’ model and how it saved rock music. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] joancarlson wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt&#8230; an interview with Thom Yorke today (January 3), earlier published in Der Spiegel, where he talks about new album ‘In Rainbows’ and the inevitable questions on Radiohead’s ‘pay-what-you-want’ model and how it saved rock music. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matto</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17908</link>
		<dc:creator>matto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17908</guid>
		<description>trent reznor is a fat goth. who cares what he said or did? no disrespect to any fat goths that may be reading this. with the exception of trent reznor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trent reznor is a fat goth. who cares what he said or did? no disrespect to any fat goths that may be reading this. with the exception of trent reznor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Suburbanite</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Suburbanite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17889</guid>
		<description>I love that he said In Rainbows is their Hunky Dory, not OKC. Damn right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that he said In Rainbows is their Hunky Dory, not OKC. Damn right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urbanlamb</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17888</link>
		<dc:creator>urbanlamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17888</guid>
		<description>well, £99,99 is about 1000 bucks (us dollars)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, £99,99 is about 1000 bucks (us dollars)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17886</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/2008/01/03/thom-yorke-in-rainbows-is-our-classic-album/#comment-17886</guid>
		<description>Er, Jamie, many small bands sell their stuff on the internet themselves, and some even have variable pricing. But a band of Radiohead's stature to do it with variable pricing was a first.

And Thom, darling: your hunky dory still is Ok Computer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, Jamie, many small bands sell their stuff on the internet themselves, and some even have variable pricing. But a band of Radiohead&#8217;s stature to do it with variable pricing was a first.</p>
<p>And Thom, darling: your hunky dory still is Ok Computer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
