![RSS Feed for Radiohead At Ease [In Rainbows]](http://www.ateaseweb.com/wp-content/themes/default/images/icon_rss.gif){kind=icon}
In Rainbows torrented 2.3 million times
Radiohead’s notorious release strategy for In Rainbows, which allowed fans to download it for an optional price with a valid e-mail address, was considered to have been a failure by some because the album became wildly popular on file sharing networks almost immediately upon its release.
But Garland and Page’s, “In Rainbows, On Torrents” report, slated to be released on the MCPS-PRS website on Friday, indicates that Radiohead’s strategy was a success nonetheless, contributing to the album topping the charts in both the UK and United States and a successful worldwide tour. When it comes to judging whether an album is a success these days, the old metrics just don’t cut it.
The report found that torrent users traded 400,000 copies of In Rainbows on its October 10 release date, and that it was shared a staggering 2.3 million times by November 3 (chart courtesy of BigChampagne). By comparison, albums by Gnarls Barkley, Panic at the Disco and Portishead released around the same time using conventional means were shared less, the most-frequently shared being Panic at the Disco’s album, which was downloaded 157,000 times in a week — about three times less than In Rainbows’ peak day of trading.
Many within the music industry (including U2 manager Paul McGuinness) will no doubt view these 2.3 million downloads as sales Radiohead lost by giving the album away in a readily-sharable format. And either way, they represent email addresses that Radiohead failed to add into its fan database.
Garland and Page admit that server problems on Radiohead’s site almost certainly drove some users to torrent trackers, as did the fact that Radiohead had “signaled” to fans that the album was free. But their most interesting finding about why fans chose to download the album via torrent rather than from InRainbows.com is their hypothesis that users adhere to music acquisition venues regardless of other factors.
“The venue hypothesis suggests that even when the price approaches zero, all other things being equal, people are more likely to act habitually (say, using The Pirate Bay) than to break their habit (say, visiting www.InRainbows.com),” reads one section of the report. In other words, people tend to develop habits around the acquisition of music; once they find something that works, they tend to keep using it. As the paper mentions, “The Pirate Bay is a powerful brand with a sterling reputation in the minds of millions of young music fans.”
The hard lesson to the music business here is that it must license venues for music acquisition that fans prefer to file sharing networks or otherwise make the toleration of file sharing part of their business plans. If even Radiohead’s freely available album was torrented 2.3 million times in the first three and a half weeks, how can more traditional offerings successfully clamp-down on file sharing? They can’t, pure and simple.
Read the full story over at WIRED.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|
Radiohead News on this day in...
2008: Radiohead Live in Cuyahoga Falls [live report] — The [...]2004: Justin Hawkins loves Radiohead — German [...]
2003: GERMAN JANUARY DATES ARE OFF — The [...]
2003: CREEP IN TOKYO — Radiohead [...]
2002: Radiohead at the Benicassim Festival — Radiohead [...]
2002: More new album details from the band — Radiohead [...]
Make A Comment: ( 11 so far )
11 Responses to “In Rainbows torrented 2.3 million times”
RAF
August 9th, 2008
what RAF said, i only torrented it in october because i was reading on message boards that people were already getting their download links and listening to the album, i hadn’t gotten my link yet, and i bought the box set, and i stayed up late on the 9th hoping for an email at midnight, when it showed up on the pink pig i grabbed it.
pogo54321
August 9th, 2008
[...] read about the report via At Ease and Wired. Having provided the obligatory links, I’ll add a good old-fashioned citation: Page [...]
In Rainbows, On Torrents « Changing Way
August 9th, 2008
oh come on!
so 1) well yeah, you had to follow a form that was messy and more complicated than just getting the torrent, so people went easy
2) it’s clear that if people only bought the CD, no one would have shared it. Apparently, you just need to say it to believe it
3) so what, panic at the disco and portishead are not as big sellers as radiohead? couldn’t it just be that more people wanted radiohead in the first place, by any means? again, where’s the surprise?
fanchoe
August 9th, 2008
Thats another 2.3 million fans..
air_towel
August 9th, 2008
How delicious, Radiohead fail, again! Leave experiments to scientists, guys!
Colony
August 10th, 2008
It’s always ridiculous to say they failed. As far as I see it, the primiary reason for doing this was to prevent an album leak prior to its release. It succeeded at this so who cares about the torrents.
Steve
August 11th, 2008
there is also an unaccountable amount were someone might have used an alternative to torrent, such as rapidshare, megaupload etc
darren
August 11th, 2008
Colony, you are so not a scientist!
Cee
August 12th, 2008
pogo, i don’t believe teh pink pig was around back then anymore, was it?
ariel
August 13th, 2008
i’d also be curious to see if the number of torrents peaked again after the box sets were delivered or the physical CD was released. i know i torrented it again to get a better quality rip while i waited for my boxset to hit my doorstep
ariel
August 13th, 2008
No, it was torrented because the official site was flooded….
get the story strait.