<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bat For Lashes cover Radiohead&#8217;s &#8216;All I Need&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/</link>
	<description>You need to lighten up, you take things too SERIUSLEE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:20:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christ-John</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-282847</link>
		<dc:creator>Christ-John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 08:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-282847</guid>
		<description>@Monkey Chops Isn&#039;t Coldplay bigger then Radiohead nowadays?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Monkey Chops Isn&#8217;t Coldplay bigger then Radiohead nowadays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-271104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-271104</guid>
		<description>Everyone posting on this site is fukking pretentious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone posting on this site is fukking pretentious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indie toba</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-262523</link>
		<dc:creator>indie toba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-262523</guid>
		<description>where is the crash for god s sake???!!!!!
it is a good cover, but the ending is all fucked up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the crash for god s sake???!!!!!<br />
it is a good cover, but the ending is all fucked up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kemoushi</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-261102</link>
		<dc:creator>kemoushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-261102</guid>
		<description>I agree, not just &#039;pretentious&#039;, but rather insulting, however...
who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, not just &#8216;pretentious&#8217;, but rather insulting, however&#8230;<br />
who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smi2ler</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-261090</link>
		<dc:creator>Smi2ler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-261090</guid>
		<description>lol...I like the song. I think Bat for Lashes are a cracking live band and im glad Radiohead brought them to my attention. As for some of the comments on here, in the words of Beck (another &quot;pretentious&quot; artist? lol) Egos drone and pose alone like black baloons all banged and blown...

pretentious? moi?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol&#8230;I like the song. I think Bat for Lashes are a cracking live band and im glad Radiohead brought them to my attention. As for some of the comments on here, in the words of Beck (another &#8220;pretentious&#8221; artist? lol) Egos drone and pose alone like black baloons all banged and blown&#8230;</p>
<p>pretentious? moi?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-260787</link>
		<dc:creator>Buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-260787</guid>
		<description>Beautific!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautific!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripfontaine</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-260569</link>
		<dc:creator>tripfontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-260569</guid>
		<description>coldplay should have to audition to play with bat for lashes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coldplay should have to audition to play with bat for lashes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas D'Urfey</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-260195</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas D'Urfey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-260195</guid>
		<description>I think she is both overrated AND pretentious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she is both overrated AND pretentious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-260014</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-260014</guid>
		<description>christ, radiohead fans accusing OTHER artists of being pretentious?  my head explodes.  not that i really consider radiohead OR bat for lashes pretentious, it&#039;s a concept i don&#039;t have much use for anyway, but if we&#039;re going in that direction, they&#039;re at LEAST as pretentious as each other.  have you SEEN any interviews with thom yorke?  it&#039;s also just a hugely unfair thing to use as a criticism for anyone who puts their art out there.  art can either fail conceptually, or succeed.  however it gets there is irrelevant.

animal collective, just as an example, make &quot;ostentatious&quot; and &quot;affected&quot; music, so by definition i could call them pretentious.  and so do radiohead for that matter.  but i consider them to be achieving what they set out to do within the parameters they&#039;ve laid down.  so who cares?

sorry.  i know it was only one person who brought this up, and he went on to say he liked the band in question, i&#039;m just so tired of people using pretentious as a criticism of art.  criticize your shitty hipster friends with their forced mannerisms and arrogant opinions as pretentious, not art.

and re:just saying; you&#039;re right, and we have the right to disagree with their shitty dismissive opinions.  kthx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>christ, radiohead fans accusing OTHER artists of being pretentious?  my head explodes.  not that i really consider radiohead OR bat for lashes pretentious, it&#8217;s a concept i don&#8217;t have much use for anyway, but if we&#8217;re going in that direction, they&#8217;re at LEAST as pretentious as each other.  have you SEEN any interviews with thom yorke?  it&#8217;s also just a hugely unfair thing to use as a criticism for anyone who puts their art out there.  art can either fail conceptually, or succeed.  however it gets there is irrelevant.</p>
<p>animal collective, just as an example, make &#8220;ostentatious&#8221; and &#8220;affected&#8221; music, so by definition i could call them pretentious.  and so do radiohead for that matter.  but i consider them to be achieving what they set out to do within the parameters they&#8217;ve laid down.  so who cares?</p>
<p>sorry.  i know it was only one person who brought this up, and he went on to say he liked the band in question, i&#8217;m just so tired of people using pretentious as a criticism of art.  criticize your shitty hipster friends with their forced mannerisms and arrogant opinions as pretentious, not art.</p>
<p>and re:just saying; you&#8217;re right, and we have the right to disagree with their shitty dismissive opinions.  kthx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aurélien</title>
		<link>http://www.ateaseweb.com/2010/02/27/bat-for-lashes-cover-radioheads-all-i-need/comment-page-1/#comment-259858</link>
		<dc:creator>Aurélien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ateaseweb.com/?p=3711#comment-259858</guid>
		<description>Wonderful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
